NY Public Payroll Watch
  Home Daily Updates News Clips Links Contact Us  

Empire Center for New York State Policy
 
 
Taylor Made: The Cost and Consequences of New York's Public-Sector Labor Laws
by Terry O'Neil and E.J. McMahon

Defusing New York's Public Pension Bomb: A Fair Approach for Workers and Taxpayers
by E.J. McMahon

 
Early retirement for state workers: Money-saver, or costly sweetener?
May 2010

State Payroll Drops and Wages Rise; Workforce Still Above 2004 Level
March 2010

    ARCHIVE >>
 

To receive regular updates from NY Public Payroll Watch, type your email address in the box below and click "submit."

Email:
For Email Marketing you can trust
 
 

June 27, 2008

Another test for Paterson

Will Governor David Paterson say "yes" to a union-giveaway that Governors Eliot Spitzer, George Pataki and Mario Cuomo vetoed eight times?

The bill approved unanimously in the Senate and by a 126-15 vote in the Assembly, requires the use of independent hearing officers in disciplinary proceedings when government employers want to fire unionized employees.

The bill applies only when the employer believes the situation may warrant dismissal. That may be impossible to determine prior to hearing all the evidence. If a case is first heard internally and new evidence emerges supporting a dismissal, the case would have to be re-heard by an outside hearing officer.

Under existing law, disciplinary hearings are conducted by an individual or body with power to appoint the employee, or a designated hearing officer. Through the collective bargaining process, the employer and union can negotiate a different procedure.

The state Conference of Mayors says the mandate:

circumvents that [existing] process and delivers to unions a major bargaining goal at no cost to them...[ and is] a giveaway of the right of public employers to gain concessions when major union objectives are agreed to in the course of collective negotiations.

The state Association of Counties (NYSAC) says the bill puts disciplinary authority "in the hands of an independent individual not answerable to the public.

The bill memo is vague about the added cost of hiring hearing officers, saying only that it "shall be divided equally between the parties" and that hearing officers could penalize those bringing frivolous claims. But NYSAC predicts:

Additional costs will also be imposed...when lengthy delays in disciplinary hearings require employers to return suspended employees to the payroll, since suspensions without pay for more than 30 days are prohibited by current statute.

As a senator, Paterson voted for earlier versions of the bill. As governor, he may have a different perspective. Ninety-four percent of executive branch employees are unionized and the Governor's Office of Employee Relations urged Spitzer to veto the bill last year.

Posted by Lise Bang-Jensen

« Previous | Main | Next »