NY Public Payroll Watch
  Home Daily Updates News Clips Links Contact Us  

Empire Center for New York State Policy
 
 
Taylor Made: The Cost and Consequences of New York's Public-Sector Labor Laws
by Terry O'Neil and E.J. McMahon

Defusing New York's Public Pension Bomb: A Fair Approach for Workers and Taxpayers
by E.J. McMahon

 
Early retirement for state workers: Money-saver, or costly sweetener?
May 2010

State Payroll Drops and Wages Rise; Workforce Still Above 2004 Level
March 2010

    ARCHIVE >>
 

To receive regular updates from NY Public Payroll Watch, type your email address in the box below and click "submit."

Email:
For Email Marketing you can trust
 
 

February 18, 2010

Retiree health benefits: unfunded promises

New York--despite facing a $55 billion liability--is one of 20 states that has set aside absolutely nothing to pay for the growing cost of health insurance for retired public employees, according to a national report.

The report by the Pew Center on the States gives New York's pension fund better grades, describing it as fully funded in 2008, but Gannett News Service describes the state's investment assumptions as "rosy"(here).

The New York State Common Retirement Fund was considered 107 percent funded in 2008, well above the 84 percent average for other states and higher than any other state in the nation....

To achieve that high level of funding, state officials assumed an 8 percent annual return on their investments. That rosy outlook is common. New York is among 22 states that assume an 8 percent return.

But the Pew report's principal author, Susan Urahn, said many private-sector pension plans use estimates closer to 6 percent or 7 percent, and billionaire investor Warren Buffett advocates an assumption closer to 4 percent.

A spokesman for State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, the state's sole trustee for retiree pension and health benefits, defended the practice.

"If you look at the performance over 20 years, it has not been an unreasonable assumption," spokesman Robert Whalen said.

On a national level, the Pew report found a $1 trillion gap between the $2.35 trillion states and participating local governments set aside for retirement benefits and the actual $3.35 cost of those benefits. Pew calls the figure "conservative," partly because its based on fiscal year 2008 figures that don't fully reflect the Wall Street meltdown.
To a significant degree, the $1 trillion gap reflects states' own policy choices and lack of discipline: failing to make annual payments for pension systems at the levels recommended by their own actuaries; expanding benefits and offering cost- of-living increases without fully considering their long-term price tag or determining how to pay for them; and providing retiree health care without adequately funding it.

Posted by Lise Bang-Jensen

« Previous | Main | Next »